Feds Let It Burn: Grand Canyon’s Historic Lodge Goes Up in Flames

By Amy Groves  

Nevada News and Views

A fast-moving wildfire, now known as the Dragon Bravo Fire, tore through the area after a lightning strike on July 4, 2025. Within days, the fire exploded across thousands of acres, fueled by scorching temperatures, low humidity, and strong winds.

On July 12 alone, it jumped another 500 acres and destroyed the iconic Grand Canyon Lodge, along with 50 to 80 nearby buildings.

It’s a loss that goes far beyond bricks and mortar.

The lodge, built in 1937 after a previous fire in 1932, was more than just a place to sleep. With its stone walls, timber beams, and sweeping views of the canyon, it was a symbol of American history and pride.

It was also the only in-park hotel on the North Rim and drew visitors from around the world, many of whom traveled through southern Nevada to get there.

Now, it’s all gone. Could this have been prevented?

Conservatives Say “Yes”

This disaster shows exactly what happens when federal land management goes off track.

The fire was originally managed as a “controlled burn” by the National Park Service, despite Arizona’s well-known dry summer conditions. Critics, including Arizona’s Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs, have called for an independent investigation into why that decision was made.

For once, conservatives agree with her. They are echoing that demand and going a step further, saying this is what happens when Washington prioritizes environmental theory over real-world fire prevention.

Across the West, federal agencies have tied the hands of local land users for years — limiting logging, blocking grazing, and creating “protected zones” that leave forests and rangelands overgrown and vulnerable to fire.

When you don’t manage the fuel, eventually nature does — and not gently.

The Economic Fallout

While most tourists visit the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, the North Rim is still a major draw, bringing in about 10 percent of the park’s 4.9 million annual visitors.

That adds up to real money for small businesses, especially in towns like Fredonia and Jacob Lake, where tourism helps keep diners, gas stations, and family-run lodges alive.

Nevada may not have taken a direct hit, but the ripple effects could still reach us. Las Vegas, Mesquite, and other southern Nevada cities are popular jump-off points for Grand Canyon travelers. Tour operators, hotels, and restaurants in these areas could all feel the pinch as tourist traffic drops.

And with 60 percent of Nevada’s land federally managed, we’ve got our own fire concerns too. The Davis Fire near Reno last fall burned nearly 9,000 acres, raising similar complaints about fuel buildup and slow federal response.

Safety Hazards Made It Worse

As if the fire wasn’t bad enough, a chlorine gas leak from the park’s damaged wastewater plant forced emergency crews and hikers to evacuate.

It also prevented aircraft from dropping fire retardant, making the blaze even harder to contain. Trails like North Kaibab and Phantom Ranch are now closed for the season.

All of this leaves locals and tourists alike shaken, and wondering if more fires are on the horizon.

A Second Fire Adds Pressure

Just north of the park, another blaze — the White Sage Fire — is also raging, having burned over 40,000 acres since July 9.

It too was sparked by lightning, and like the Dragon Bravo Fire, it remains at 0 percent containment.

Combined, these two fires are putting over 500 firefighters to work and stretching emergency resources thin.

Where Do We Go From Here?

Many Americans, from both sides of the aisle, are calling for federal agencies like the National Park Service and the U.S. Forest Service to rethink their approach.

That includes giving more power to state and local governments to manage fire risks through thinning, grazing, and other hands-on methods.

Many are also asking why federal bureaucrats, often based in D.C., are making high-stakes decisions about land they’ve never stepped foot on.

The Grand Canyon Lodge can’t be brought back, but maybe this fire can serve as a wake-up call — one that forces Washington to finally listen to folks who know the land, love it, and live with its consequences.

*